When I started to upload the 600dpi images (was it last February?), I discovered the displayed image was too large.
When I started to add the 357px to the image file section, I found the line was too hard to read quickly. I added a single space between Template section and Image file (also removing the 'Thumb' & any 'ENTER' character that was in many of the pages.
However, if I shouldn't have done added the space, there are 6,000+ cards that need to be edited.
I changed the few I just saw back to having the space.
First on www.trekcc.org these cards are listed as part of The Troubles With Tribbles expansion. Second there are decks that make use of these cards by using Q's Tent to make a side game. So the remark that they are only used in Tribbles CCG is not accurate anymore.
I suggest to delete that inaccurate comment and let it be for the rest.
Good points. I am not a player, so the fine point of a side deck is outside of my experience.
Looking at it from the other direction, the cards 120-141 do come from TTWT booster packs. So definitely, they belong to that expansion's card list.
If the card list is separated into two lists then the link #2 The Trouble With Tribbles on the page https://cardguide.fandom.com/wiki/Tribbles_CCG can directly link to the "new" second part of the TTWT card list. Similar to the Archive cards.
Cards 120 to 141 should remain as part of the Trouble With Tribbles expansion listing. What was done for the Archive, Archive Portrait and 2E Expansion sets contaning these cards can be applied to the Trouble With Tribbles listing. I suggest that the table made for cards 120 to 141 be placed after the main card listing and before the Federation Starter Deck listing.
However, I believe that the Tribbles and Trouble cards from The Trouble With Tribbles and Reflections expansions should remain on the Tribbles CCG page since that page lists cards that are used with the Tribbles game. The table can be updated to include links to the Tribbles CCG listings on The Trouble With Tribbles and Reflections pages, thereby the listings The Trouble With Tribbles (Tribbles CCG) and Reflections (Tribbles CCG) pages.
Although I can confirm these four cards are in the actual TTWT Klingon box (I have three with the original cards still in them), I can't discount they might also be found in the booster packs.
Other than Captain Koloth, all the other cards in the box are reprints. ie: If the original has a different copyright date or it is a 'Tribbled' card, then it is easy to identify it as a "reprint" (a different card).
However, in the case of these four cards, the dates are the same as the expansion card dates (2000), so I can't show any image difference.
I recommend just deleting the above 'TTWTKli' pages and add a note on the Klingon subset to identify these cards were also in the box. The links to them are already gone. Only the 1_Tribble_-_Go_(TTWTKli) card has a PREV link to the last card in the Klingon subset.
This card was not originally printed with this expansion (These Are The Voyages). It was later on released as a promotional foiled card for The Continuing Committee's 2008 Regionals. However it did get the rarity Rare instead of Promo.
It was put in the expansion, because of the expansion number on it, with the above mentioned as Trivia.
I think the Promo version should be deleted, because it was intended as a Promo, but it became a Rare and it is listed in TATV expansion.
"The Archive series consists of foiled versions of 18 selected rare cards from each of six expansion sets." In effect, they are just foiled reprints. Whereas the Archive Portrait cards are actual separate PROMO cards and correctly are shown as a separate set.
Yes, the continuning committee describes them as an expansion. I believe this to be an error on their part. These cards are better listed as a subset of their respective expansions.
I think that the Archive subsets are a sub-expansion of the in this case Strange New Worlds expansion. I am convinced that these pages are good as they are. Perhaps you overlooked that there are also virtual Archive & Archive Portrait cards, that are not mentioned on the main expansion page.
Is there a reason to have two complete sets of tables of the same cards? Seems just a link(s) would be sufficient to the promo table(s) for the parent expansions. Maintaining duplicate listings (card count, rarity count, type count, etc) is prone to errors.
The initial idea was to have a list with all promos from a game on one page. Today it is not necessary anymore, because people can go to the page Category:Promo (Star Trek CCG 2E) and get all the promos that way.
Came across four cards with "scratch marks" on them. However, close inspection shows the marks are from the commercial printer. Look closely between middle left side if Kira and right side of Jasad. The scratch mark goes across the cards. Since the cards were printed as a sheet, the "scratch mark" isn't from user handling. I discovered two other cards with the same "scratch" marks.
I have uploaded a special image with all four cards for you to inspect. (delete when done). I will upload the cards normally and let you decide if they should be used or UNDO. Scratched_CL.jpg
It really comes down to what a misprint is. If Decipher creates a card that is mistyped or has the wrong image, then it is already added as a separate misprinted version. The holodeck site has two different cards one of which omitted site location information [| Holosuite]. That, I consider a misprint.
The "gossamer thread" of ink that fell onto the card(s) during printing isn't a misprint, just a bad printing of one individual sheet. I suspect given the 10s of millions of cards printed, the number of cards in this situation would exceed the number of actual card titles.
This is your WiKi. You have the final say. If a section is created for this in Captains Log, a section should be created in ALL THE OTHER releases (30,854 pages is a lot of possible printer issues.)
(Just a note to state the card needs a new image to replace the bad printing?)